Citizens of Idaho 


HomeAbout UsOur Corrupt SystemWhat is Property?Ninth Amendment PartyServices
PaperworkSeminar InfoSuggested LinksIdaho ForeclosuresWords / Quotes Pictures

the state of Idaho "Constitutional = Lawful"
Which State are you presumed to live in?
this State of Idaho "Hybrid = Lawful and Legal"

that STATE OF IDAHO "CORPORATE CAPACITY AGENCY= IDAPA = IDAHO
Administrative Procedure Act, Rules and Policy" 
Citizens with proper status duly recorded are guaranteed a republic form of government, prosecution by criminal action by the people of the state of Idaho, civil remedy by civil action, and feigned issues are prohibited. Trial by jury of peers with due process of law, innocent until guilty.
Applies to individuals and entities enfranchised by State law, corporations, associations, ie etc. Citizens with proper status duly recorded are guaranteed a republic form of government, prosecution by criminal action by the people of the state of Idaho, civil remedy by civil action, and feigned issues are prohibited. Trial by jury of peers with due process of law, innocent until guilty.

Trial by jury of the same status with due process, innocent till proven guilty with criminal sanction.
You are under administrative corporate law regulated by the legislative branch, administrative courts utilizing interpretive rule making which does not have the force of law. You are guilty till proven innocent, jury of Corporate status, jury tampering, racketeering, fines, fees and mandates of political correctness known as color of law. This is all brought forth under presumption, by your CORPORATE NAME and the STATE OF IDAHO including its "PUBLIC AGENCY" subdivisions does not have to follow the Constitution.
According to Idaho Criminal Rules 54.1 (g) one may use a statute. This was just taken off.... back dated and repealed. We wonder why? Below is the criminal activity here in Idaho, perpetrated across the State of Idaho.

You will be denied by District Judges and the Supreme Court Justices through Administrative Interpretive Rule Making substance due process of law to use Idaho Statutes IC 1-2213(1)"pursuant to law" which protected you from malicious prosecution which is prima facia malice.






You will be denied by District Judges and the Supreme Court Justices through Administrative Interpretive Rule Making substance due process of law to use Idaho Statutes IC 19-3942 "TRIAL ON APPEAL" which protect you from malicious prosecution which is prima facia malice.

You will be denied by District Judges and the Supreme Court Justices through Administrative Interpretive Rule Making substance due process of law to use Idaho Statutes IC 7-1303(3) "proves 2 forms of government exist at all times" which protected you from malicious prosecution which is prima facia malice.

You will be denied by District Judges and the Supreme Court Justices through Administrative Interpretive Rule Making substance due process of law to use Idaho Statutes IC 73-106 "accrued rights" which protected you from malicious prosecution which is prima facia malice.

You will be denied by District Judges and the Supreme Court Justices through Administrative Interpretive Rule Making substance due process of law to use Idaho Statutes IC 73-116 "common law enforced" which protected you from malicious prosecution which is prima facia malice.

You will be denied by District Judges and the Supreme Court Justices through Administrative Interpretive Rule Making substance due process of law to use Idaho Statutes IC 9-102 "questions of law" which protected you from malicious prosecution which is prima facia malice.

You will be denied by District Judges and the Supreme Court Justices through Administrative Interpretive Rule Making substance due process of law to use Idaho Statutes IC 18-3601 forgery defined in regards to the imposition of the CORPORATE NAME "ALL CAPS" example JOHN DOE, which protected you from malicious prosecution which is prima facia malice.

The STATE OF IDAHO commits forgery when they change your proper name True Name, example John Doe to a fictional ADMINISTRATIVE CORPORATE NAME "example JOHN DOE" which is prima facia malice.

You will be denied by District Judges and the Supreme Court Justices through Administrative Interpretive Rule Making substance due process of law to use Idaho Statutes IC 18-102 intent to defraud regards to the imposition of the CORPORATE NAME which protected you from malicious prosecution which is prima facia malice.

You will be denied by District Judges and the Supreme Court Justices through Administrative Interpretive Rule Making substance due process of law to use Idaho Statutes IC 9-303 "statutes public or private" dealing with difference in standing dejure v defacto which protected you from malicious prosecution which is prima facia malice.

You will be denied by District Judges and the Supreme Court Justices through Administrative Interpretive Rule Making substance due process of law to use Idaho Statutes IC 9-308 oral evidence" which protected you from malicious prosecution which is prima facia malice.

You will be denied by District Judges and the Supreme Court Justices through Administrative Interpretive Rule Making substance due process of law to use Idaho Statutes IC 9-309 conclusiveness which protected you from malicious prosecution which is prima facia malice.

You will be denied by District Judges and the Supreme Court Justices through Administrative Interpretive Rule Making substance due process of law to use Idaho Statutes IC 9-321 public or private record how proved which protected you from malicious prosecution which is prima facia malice.

You will be denied by District Judges and the Supreme Court Justices through Administrative Interpretive Rule Making substance due process of law to use Idaho Statutes IC 18-7805 racketeering on how the current administrative judicial system has a conflict of interest which protected you from malicious prosecution which is prima facia malice.

You will be denied by District Judges and the Supreme Court Justices through Administrative Interpretive Rule Making substance due process of law to use Idaho Statutes IC 9-325 certified copies of writings which protected you from malicious prosecution which is prima facia malice.

You will be denied by District Judges and the Supreme Court Justices through Administrative Interpretive Rule Making substance due process of law to use Idaho Statutes IC 55-401 personal property governed by your domicile in regards to your property True Name which protected you from malicious prosecution which is prima facia malice.

The intimidation under assertion of authority of law is a criminal act and unlawful under Idaho Code 18-3005 1(b)(c)(d) and 2(a)(c) subject to fine and arrest.

The STATE OF IDAHO leads the nation per capita in regards to incarceration. We are living in a CORPORATE POLICE STATE that disregards the fundamental principles of our founding fathers along with our family, friends and others who have died to protect our nation from such destruction, known as tyranny.
Copyright Citizens of Idaho (U1777) 2010
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
What they don't want you to know!
IDAHO
PORK REPORTS
DECEIVING THE PEOPLE BY WORKING IN CORPORATE CAPACITY.
When I returned today at the SOS, 2/13/12,  I requested additional CORPORATE verification such as: 

CASSIA COUNTY, 

CASSIA COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, 

ADA COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, 

FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF IDAHO,

SUPREME COURT OF THE
STATE OF IDAHO

I was denied and
the policy had been 
changed by this deceitful administration.
This is a simple area of jurisdiction that proves when acting as a "CORPORATION
one does not have to follow the Constitution 
due to not being registered within the
State of Idaho.
CONSTITUTIONAL LINKS ARE IN BLUE AND UNDERLINED

CORPORATE LINKS ARE IN RED AND UNDERLINED
Here in the State of Idaho we have judges that do not support the Constitution of the State and support the 
CORPORATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS
which 
deny your 
Constitutional Rights.

In District 5 in CASSIA COUNTY
is where the most corruption within the boundaries of the State of Idaho exist.

Judge Hodges, Judge Bollar, 
Judge Crabtree

In the SUPREME COURT one of the worst justices is Jim Jones who disallows the use of law in Idaho.This Justice hides behind his black robe and throws away the substantive right of a dejure person in the state of Idaho. 

In District 7 we have Judges who allow the law of the state to apply when properly domiciled within the state of Idaho dejure.

In District 4 we have Judges who allow the law of the state to apply when properly domiciled within the state of Idaho dejure.

However beware of Judge Theresa Gardunia who will violate all your Constitutional rights. 

In District 3 we have Judges who allow the law of the state to apply when properly domiciled within the state of Idaho dejure.

ADMINISTRATIVE
After hand delivering this in 2010 after the day of election the Governor, Attorney General, Speaker of the House and Pro Tempore of the Senate have never set up any time to discuss the fraud, corruption in State government or CORPORATE SPECIAL PURPOSE ENTITIES which are not registered as a municipal corporation at the Secretary of State office. 
WHY?
Because if entities register, then they must follow the rule of law, and both Constitutions.

Idaho also ranks in the lower half of the 50 states for lack of transparency within local, county and state government.
We are looking for input and reviews please send your comments.These reports are from independent cases and are verified by court entered documents.
As you read the brochure from Attorney General Wasden as our investigation proves he is one of the biggest violators in State Government along with our current Governor Otter, who has sold Idaho out to the Chinese military. We must defend our state as constitutional people of the state of Idaho and vote them out!
CORRUPTION IN IDAHO 
Download here 2012 STATE INTEGRITY REPORT
DUNS # 07-313-3787
DUNS # 833720162
DUNS # 617084934
DUNS # 833068732
DUNS # 782743116
ATTORNEY GENERAL LAWRENCE WASDEN
QUOTE "CHANGE THE LAW"
GOVERNOR
BUTCH OTTER
QUOTE "SOLD TO CHINA"
360708499
007111936
049146911
030536184
020916941
052046138
188922538
602460909
602460933
602460966
603547662
603547753
603547803
603547837
603547860
603547902
603547969
603547993
603548066
603548116
603548124
Constitutional Defense Fund
Liberty is lost due to 
CORPORATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS 
placing fraud on the people of the state.
COURTS IN IDAHO  DUNS AND BRADSTREET NUMBER
COURTS IN IDAHO DUNS AND BRADSTREET NUMBERS
COURTS IN IDAHO DUNS AND BRADSTREET NUMBERS
Join me and defend our stand for liberty!
Say NO to victimless crimes!
 click on
below
 click on
below
click on
below
102582215
001990733
00190733
182015420
182858688
878141274
619723646
805443959
053513185
603548124
781682091
780544888
007087835
053513185
878141191
PROBATION AND PAROLE DUNS AND BRADSTREET NUMBERS
NOTICE, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION IS TRADED ON THE OPEN MARKET. 

YOU ARE TREATED AS A COMMODITY, AS IF YOU WERE CORPORATE LIVESTOCK.
615879682
182043133
 click on
below
click on below to see the entire STATE  list
THE GREAT
CORPORATION NATION
LEARN THE TRUTH
CLICK CORPORATION NATION AND WATCH A MOVIE
THE GREAT 
PENSION FUND HOAX
LEARN THE TRUTH
CLICK PENSION FUND HOAX AND WATCH A MOVIE
SPENDING YOUR MONEY
ONE PIG AT AT TIME!
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FORM
DOWNLOAD HERE
Idaho, organized and incorporated "to do the peoples business" in 1863 as a territory, such was continued in 1890 as a state of the American union.
QUESTIONS
Please email us we have been having problems with the request form.. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Did you know that all 56 Senior Judges 
have no valid Oath of Office?
Prior to June 18, 2012
According to the Secretary of State Office
I, ..............., do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be) that as a senior judge of the state of Idaho, I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Idaho, and that upon hereafter accepting any assignment to serve as a senior judge of a court of this state I will faithfully discharge the duties thereof to the best of my ability.".
CLICK TO VERIFY SENIOR JUDGES OATH SEC:7
District 1
QUENTIN F. HARDEN invalid since 2000,
JAMES F. JUDD invalid since 2001
ROBERT B. BURTON invalid since 2008
CHARLES W. HOSAK invalid since 2009
EUGENE MARANO invalid since 2005
DON L. SWANSTROM invalid since 2003

District 2
GEORGE REINHARDT invalid since 2003
WILLIAM C. HAMLETT invalid since 2005

District 3
DENNIS E. GOFF invalid since 2003
JAMES C. MORFITT invalid since 2007
GREGORY M. CULET invalid since 2012
WILLIAM B. DILLON III invalid since 2008
BRADLY S. FORD invalid since 2009
JAMES C. PEART invalid since 2006

District 4
DARREL R. PERRY invalid since 2006
ALAN M. SCHWARTZMAN invalid since 2003
DANIEL C. HURLBUTT JR. invalid since 2003
KAREN J. VEHLOW invalid since 2003
D. DUFF MCKEE invalid since 2000
LOWELL D. CASTLETON invalid sine 2002
GERALD F. SHROEDER invalid since 2011
HENRY R. BOOMER invalid since 2010
WAYNE L. KIDWELL invalid since 2004
JOHN C. VEHLOW invalid since 2005
RICHARD A. SCHMIDT invalid since 2008
LINDA COPPLE TROUT invalid since 2007
GEORGE D. CAREY invalid since 2002
R. MICHAEL DENNARD invalid since 2002
A. RICHARD GRANT invalid since 2002
CHARLES L. HAY invalid since 2005
DARLA WILLIAMSON invalid since 2010
KATHERYN A. STICKLEN invalid since 2006
PATRICIA YOUNG invalid since 2011

District 5
ROY C. HOLLOWAY invalid since 2003
DANIEL C. HURLBUTT JR. invalid since 2000
DANIEL B. MEEHL invalid since 2001
R. MICHAEL REDMAN invalid since 2003
PETER D. MCDERMOTT invalid since 2009
JOHN F VARIN invalid since 2005
HOWARD SMYSER invalid since 2006
BARRY WOOD invalid since 2009

District 6
WILLIAM H. WOODLAND invalid since 2003
DON L. HARDING invalid since 2008
RONALD M. HART invalid since 2009
MARK BEEBE invalid since 1992

District 7
ROBERT C. BROWER invalid since 2003
EARL BLOWER invalid since 2012
GREGORY S. ANDERSON invalid since 2011
RICHARD T. ST CLAIR invalid since 2007
COLIN LUKE invalid since 2004
LINDA COOK invalid since 2006
JAMES MARTSCH invalid since 1999
MICHAEL KENNEDY invalid since 1996
JERRY MEYERS invalid since 2003
THE PROBLEM IS THERE IS NO OATH UNIFORMITY IN ANY OF THE DISTRICTS...
LETS MAKE ONE UP...
CORPORATE LOYALTY OATH according to
 IC 59-401
OATH to CORPORATE STATE AND COUNTY / LOYALTY OATH / UNKNOWN OATH
IMPROPER SENIOR OATH
In our opinion,all judgements or orders done by any of the above Senior Judgesare null and void since he or she was acting outside the jurisdiction of the state without a proper oath.

The Senior Judge is supposed to be the Constitutional Judge according to the Idaho statute below.
However the State of Idaho
Judges Rule Book has 
changed the oath, for profit.
BELOW
JAMES D. CARLSON
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
ELIZABETH
CHAVEZ
THE STATE OF IDAHO 
JUDICIAL COUNCIL OR SPECIAL MASTERS
WHERE YOUR COMPLAINTS FALL ON DEATH EARS!
CHIEF JUSTICE
RONALD J. WILPER
MAGISTRATE
THOMAS H. BORRESEN
MAGISTRATE
Double click on name to download official oath. If name is not highlighted NO OATH ON RECORD as of October 3, 2012.
Click and read reply from Secretary of States Office.
Idaho Statute 1-2103. Removal, disciplining, or retirement of judges or justices -- Procedure. A justice of the Supreme Court or judge of any district court, in accordance with the procedure prescribed in this section, may be disciplined or removed for wilful misconduct in office or wilful and persistent failure to perform his duties or habitual intemperance or conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings judicial office into disrepute, or he may be retired for disability seriously interfering with the performance of his duties, which is, or is likely to become of a permanent character. The judicial council may, after such investigation as the council deems necessary, order a hearing to be held before it concerning the removal, discipline or retirement of a justice or a judge, or the council may in its discretion request the Supreme Court to appoint three (3) special masters, who shall be justices or judges, to hear and take evidence in any such matters, and to report their findings to the council. If, after hearing, or after considering the record and the findings and report of the masters, the council finds good cause therefor, it shall recommend to the Supreme Court the removal, discipline or retirement, as the case may be, of the justice or judge.
The Supreme Court shall review the record of the proceedings on the law and facts and in its discretion may permit the introduction of additional evidence and shall order removal, discipline or retirement, as it finds just and proper, or wholly reject the recommendation. Upon an order for retirement, the justice or judge shall thereby be retired with the same rights and privileges as if he retired pursuant to other provisions of law. Upon an order for removal, the justice or judge shall thereby be removed from office, and his salary shall cease from the date of such order.
All papers filed with and the proceedings before the judicial council or masters appointed by the Supreme Court, pursuant to this section, shall be subject to disclosure according to chapter 3, title 9, Idaho Code, provided, however, that if allegations against a judge are made public by the complainant, judge or third persons, the judicial council may, in its discretion, comment on the existence, nature, and status of any investigation. The filing of papers with and the giving of testimony before the council or the masters shall be privileged; but no other publication of such papers or proceedings shall be privileged in any action for defamation except that (a) the record filed by the council in the Supreme Court continues privileged and upon such filing loses its confidential character and (b) a writing which was privileged prior to its filing with the council or the masters does not lose such privilege by such filing. The judicial council shall by rule provide for procedures under this section, including the exercise of requisite process and subpoena powers. A justice or judge who is a member of the council or Supreme Court shall not participate in any proceedings involving his own removal, discipline or retirement.
This section is alternative to, and cumulative with, the removal of justices and judges by impeachment, and the original supervisory control of members of the judicial system by the Supreme Court. 
There's NO REMEDY in SERVITUDE!
NO ABSOLUTE RIGHTS PUBLIC DEFENDER WRITES. CLICK AND DOWNLOAD